FREE TOOL · LOCAL-FIRST

Your topic cluster.
Mapped without theatre.

Drop in a crawl export. Get a transparent audit of coverage, intent, depth, duplication, and internal structure — with the next 10 actions ranked.

Run your audit
€0

No account

LOCAL

No upload

5 SIGNALS

No magic score

01 · INPUT

Audit one topic cluster.

A
Pages export

Screaming Frog/Sitebulb CSV recommended. Sitemap XML, index.json, or a URL list also works with lower confidence.

No file selected
B
Internal links export

Optional Source/Destination CSV. This replaces structural estimates with your real link graph.

Optional
Paste data instead

Files stay in your browser. Nothing is uploaded or stored.

THE MODEL

A diagnostic.
Not a Google metric.

Google does not expose a topical authority score. This audit refuses to invent one. The headline score is a documented combination of five observable inputs: topic coverage, intent breadth, internal structure, content depth, and basic page quality.

Confidence changes with the input. A sitemap gives a directional URL audit. A crawl export adds metadata, depth, and word counts. A separate link export makes the graph analysis real.

Read the topical authority framework →

QUESTIONS

Does the audit upload my crawl data?

No. CSV, XML, JSON, and URL data are parsed locally in your browser. The files are not sent to nikoalho.fi or another service.

Which crawl export works best?

A Screaming Frog or Sitebulb pages CSV with URL, title, meta description, H1, word count, crawl depth, and inlinks gives a strong baseline. Add a Source/Destination internal-links CSV for the highest-confidence graph analysis.

Is the score a Google metric?

No. Google does not publish a topical authority score. This tool is a transparent diagnostic model for coverage, intent breadth, depth, page quality, and internal structure.

Can I use only a sitemap?

Yes, but the result has low confidence because a sitemap exposes URLs without page titles, word counts, or the internal link graph.